TOMO、射波刀、伽玛刀等放疗技术比较及实际使用交流贴

老马 发表于 2012-2-26 02:24

) S/ L* o1 a5 O6 ~                               
登录/注册后可看大图

$ Z1 c( M/ q" V% }: v% L  vTomoTherapy--螺旋断层放射放疗
3 M/ Q  K7 O3 ^( c2 j, s" q螺旋断层放疗系统（TOMO）集IMRT（调强放射治疗）和IGRT（图像引导放射治疗 ...

* U# d& v* W, r. ?弱弱的问老马，有适合巨型的放疗么

乏血供HCC，gamma刀后二月复查MRI提示肿瘤进展，此期二月未采用其它治疗手段（只吃保肝药）。

沈阳军区总医院也有一台TOMO啦，我就是做的这个，效果还是不错的

6 V# U, j. i: P" u& L) O' q; d请问各位，恶性间皮瘤可不可以作放疗？Tomo, 射波，伽玛那种合适些？

脑部放疗，上午比下午敏感许多！
$ m( r  V, T8 Q9 M0 v) v
4 E3 v& ~9 T$ U% C9 n$ _+ o
Cancer 2011 Jan 15;117(2):414-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25423. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
Gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastasis of nonsmall cell lung cancer: is there a difference in outcome between morning and afternoon treatment?
$ m" Q7 M8 p& w4 I+ KRahn DA 3rd, Ray DK, Schlesinger DJ, Steiner L, Sheehan JP, O'Quigley JM, Rich T.
: N' j9 l- r7 k8 G% t$ PSourceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
! W/ y% b) j- y0 Y( f6 H5 s/ g; U
: q0 `' S6 D+ ~Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circadian cell-cycle progression causes fluctuating radiosensitivity in many tissues, which could affect clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether outcomes of single-session gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) differ based on treatment time.
  h& g- Q; e2 J' l) l
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients received GKRS between 10:00 am and 12:30 pm and 39 patients received GKRS between 12:30 pm and 3:00 pm. The mean peripheral dose was 18.6 Gy. The mean tumor size was 7.3 cm³. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to score local control at 3 months. Cause of death (COD) was categorized as central nervous system (CNS)-related or systemic.

RESULTS: Demographic and disease characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Local control at 3 months was achieved in 97% (35/36) of patients who underwent GKRS early in the day versus 67% (8/12) of patients who underwent GKRS later in the day (chi-square, P = .014). Early GKRS was associated with better survival (median 9.5 months) than late GKRS (median 5 months) (Kaplan-Meier log-rank test, P = .025). Factors contributing to better survival in a Cox regression model included early treatment time (P = .004) and recursive partition analysis class (P < .001). Cause of death in the early treatment group was CNS-related in 6% (3/47) of patients versus 24% (8/34) of patients in the late treatment group (chi-square test, P = .026).

- Y( q- ?5 A2 V- xCONCLUSIONS: GKRS for metastatic NSCLC had better local control, better survival, and a lower rate of CNS-related cause of death when given earlier in the day versus later in the day. These retrospective data should encourage future study in brain radiosurgery and non-CNS stereotactic body radiotherapy series.

常弓 发表于 2012-8-21 20:18

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

. A; z+ E- p2 U0 E我们打算做伽马刀

千万不要做伽马刀，这已经是几乎被淘汰的技术，我父亲治病时候两个病友，肺转移，都是做完伽马刀以后病情恶化很快就走了，一定要做放疗，建议做射波刀和TOMO，虽然价格相对伽马刀高昂很多，但无论从疗效精确度还是病人的副反应来说，都远胜伽马刀

我本人于2011年6月，因为头部核磁观察，原有疑似单发病灶有水肿，医生建议做头部X刀治疗，做一个头部面部磨具，当时是两天做一次，我一共照射了五次，没有任何不适感觉，治疗后至今稳定，我本人考虑头部或许不是转移病灶。

前世今生 发表于 2012-11-25 17:40

8 h  a" T* L( ?2 b  }                               
登录/注册后可看大图

我本人于2011年6月，因为头部核磁观察，原有疑似单发病灶有水肿，医生建议做头部X刀治疗，做一个头部面部磨 ...

# g9 f% m+ q* O' |& m照肿瘤病人的治疗规律，不管怎样，稳定就好，也不去管是否误诊了，这也是我们的悲哀

我刚做了伽马刀不久现状况还好

不错顶