• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

[基础知识] 给ICB免疫减毒增效的 药物(十九)--肌苷、β-葡聚糖

[复制链接]
2929 0 自学自救 发表于 昨天 17:11 |

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
第一部分 肌苷
0 t$ N$ l' M/ }& S5 h/ m) g . B! _5 M; {- M# u3 _2 V& f

/ D' }9 O& i) Q0 O《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》 一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验:
7 E9 }" x) J1 A. j( Q4 E( {4 h% g
# b; o+ q  c4 D1 E1、入组患者:172名晚期实体瘤患者,分为 ICB免疫治疗+肌苷组和 ICB免疫治疗组不联合肌苷(该组部分患者联合了化疗或者靶向)两组,每组86名患者。
/ G& `( i' I8 C' ?7 D ; b0 p8 \7 ]" j" A& t+ \. P4 i
2、肌苷用法:口服肌苷片,每天三次,每次0.2克。
8 I. v. s4 n- a' |/ l  D! M+ _ $ X$ P4 u4 v* G  c
3、试验结果:肌苷组和非肌苷组中位PFS (95% CI)分别为7.00(5.31-8.69)和4.40(3.10-5.70)个月(风险比[HR]0.63;95%置信区间为0.44–0.90,p= 0.011),肌苷组PFS提高有统计学意义。ORR分别为26.7%和15.1%(p= 0.061),肌苷组ORR有改善。非肌苷组中位OS为29.67个月(95% CI 17.40–41.94),肌苷组中位OS尚未达到。
5 W. L8 A- F. q- H7 v  X
+ N% w1 h. s* j8 g1 Z肌苷组和非肌苷组分别有25名(29%)和31名(36%)患者出现3级和4级不良反应,肌苷组的不良反应趋于减少。# s: _: I8 q! a$ y, T1 B* A

) N) @  w5 Y1 }  i  K 3 q+ K( p$ H0 n" z

7 C6 m" c# ?. `) q" n3 H$ [: w" Q+ Q第二部分 β-葡聚糖+ D  s( }1 d. o

3 J/ t9 }7 A( M, E3 {6 ?5 V
: i: I' L$ N2 Z$ V* x《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验,β-葡聚糖+pd-1i 恩沃利 + 抗血管生成药物治疗先前pd-1i治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌。9 s& K1 v6 V& H/ T3 u! Z; S  F
2 g; x# j9 W2 S! x* q9 o- y9 o
1、入组患者:23名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者之前用pd-1i治疗都已经失败。0 E( U7 v& ^  q$ g4 V! M
4 K8 |. ?! ~% N
2、β-葡聚糖用法:每天两次,每次500毫克。
9 r6 ]9 S8 ]" S  i
. t( d+ ?7 @6 u" s7 H3、试验结果:ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9%.,PFS 4.3个月,OS 8.9个月。PD-L1阳性和阴性亚组之间的mPFS有显著差异(6.3个月对2.3个月,p = 0.002)。; C- N; R) D9 c1 l9 B0 ?

$ [( V/ W& E" L- j52.2%的患者发生了治疗相关的不良事件。最常见的原因是甲状腺功能减退(26.1%)和疲劳(26.1%)。报告了2例(8.7%)3级不良事件。未观察到与死亡相关的不良反应。: @: x" w8 f, i6 K7 c
7 ^2 f+ Q1 _+ g1 V
蛋白质组学分析显示CASP-8、ARG1、MMP12、CD28和CXCL5的水平与对治疗的抗性相关,而CD40-L和EGF的水平与有利的反应相关。8 M6 _9 w5 w5 O- K

+ R* B- R& m3 C! j(因为患者都是之前用pd-1i都已经失败的患者,所以ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9% 还是很不错的)) j4 p2 ]4 T0 a( q; a' p' M+ S

( u$ L+ q5 o2 i0 D2 _: C 7 m; b; f" @7 }! t# \4 g
I 《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》' v! s& Y# C7 N- F

3 z" }6 B, X. C) V# \Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors." G) ^6 p4 U% J0 U

$ |6 V' T$ ]. wMethods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).
  D' u4 v$ ]- f4 @ + L) B0 u5 h2 ]4 P2 R6 I+ ^
Results: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group.
+ U) A- O' Q0 H3 W( ]3 ?9 y
, p. `! W$ Y7 ~& y  N9 @Conclusion: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions.
; d0 q+ |2 _5 W8 Z  `3 @% `( @! z
4 m8 ?) b0 b" N3 x, D $ _& {, G+ \" H' c- k7 x2 a8 C
+ e, R! L: D6 A( o; _9 _
II 《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》
! C8 ^4 I3 [4 ~) ?+ B
6 H# X6 f8 g5 B7 y5 @& w' T7 T; Y7 o# rBackground: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis.
( x, L+ G; d. ^9 |* Q 2 n" {* `" W: t9 n4 s% G
Results: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response.
1 k' S; }1 ^/ U
$ d& k( g  j- ?+ u" |) xConclusion: β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表